PALESTINE IS A VICTIM OF THE IRANIAN-SAUDI WAR
Muslim worshippers perform Friday noon prayer near the Dome of the Rock mosque in Jerusalem's Old City's al-Aqsa mosque compound on Dec. 22, 2017. Ahmad Gharabli /AFP |
The two regional powerhouses
are more focused on fighting each other than challenging Trump's Jerusalem
decision.
On Feb. 18, 1979, just a few days after the overthrow of the Shah of
Iran and the triumphant return to the country of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, a
private plane landed in Tehran at dusk carrying Yasser Arafat. The Palestinian
leader was the first foreign dignitary to visit Tehran after the revolution,
and he seemed buoyed by hopes that the historic events would provide him with
momentum in his own liberation struggle. “I felt as if I was landing in
Jerusalem,” he later told Iranian reporters.
The next day, the Israeli trade mission was handed over to Arafat’s
Palestine Liberation Organization. “Today, we are witnessing the victory of the
Islamic revolution in Iran and tomorrow we shall be the victors in Palestine,”
an ebullient Arafat declared. “We shall liberate the land of Palestine under
the leadership of Imam Khomeini.”
Even before returning to Iran, Khomeini had cleverly identified the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict as the issue that would allow him to rally the
Muslim world and expand the appeal of his revolution beyond his Shiite sect.
And ever since 1979, the Palestinian cause has been at the center of the
rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran for regional preeminence.
At any other time, U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement declaring
Jerusalem the capital of Israel would therefore constitute an opportunity for
the two regional powers to one-up each other in opposition to the move. These
days, however, Saudi Arabia and Iran are too busy fighting each other to offer
significant pushback to Trump’s decision.
While Iranian support has not delivered Jerusalem to the Palestinians,
the cause has served Iran’s regional ambitions well. In 1979, Iran launched a
yearly Jerusalem Day to broadcast its support for the Palestinians and named
the elite expeditionary unit of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
after the holy city. It has also extended its influence into the Arab world by
arming and financing the Palestinian militant group Hamas and the Lebanese
organization Hezbollah.
In the aftermath of the Islamic Revolution, even Saudi Arabia seemed
ready to present a common front with Iran on the issue of Palestine. Following
Arafat’s visit to Tehran, a headline in the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Rai al-Aam on
Feb. 19 read: “Saudi Arabia praises the Iranian revolution.”
Yes, you read that right. Before Saudi Arabia and Iran started ripping
the region apart, Riyadh seemed ready to work with Iran’s new leaders even as
Before Saudi Arabia and Iran started ripping the region apart, Riyadh seemed ready to work with Iran’s new leaders
their friend the Shah had just been removed. Quoting the Saudi newspaper
Al-Nadwa, Al-Rai al-Aam said Saudi Arabia had warned against any moves that
would undermine the “courageous stance taken by Iran in support of the Arab
nation and its struggle against the Zionist enemy.”
Needless to say, this was a short-lived moment, which ended when the
Saudis realized the danger Khomeini posed to them — but it was indicative of
the mood in the region at the time, just a decade after the searing defeat of
the 1967 Six-Day War. The Saudis tried to keep up with the Iranians’ rhetoric
and posturing: After initially indicating tepid support for Egyptian President
Anwar Sadat’s peace accords with Israel in 1978, they reversed course by early
1979. Arafat, emboldened by Khomeini’s support, led the charge against Egypt
with other hardliners, like Syria, also a Khomeini ally. In April 1979, Saudi
Arabia cut ties with Egypt and its information minister excoriated Sadat for
his decision to “exchange diplomatic representation with the Zionist enemy,
without taking into consideration the minimum demands.”
But constrained by its alliance with the United States, Saudi Arabia
never fully backed an armed struggle against Israel. It always preferred to
offer diplomatic initiatives, from the peace plan put forward by King Fahd in
1982 to King Abdullah’s 2002 peace initiative. This was part of Saudi Arabia’s
effort to build up its image as a consensus builder and a regional leader that
could deliver the rest of the Arab world for a comprehensive peace with Israel.
Today, the Saudis are even more constrained — not only by their
alliance with Washington but by their almost singled-minded focus on beating
back Iran, for which they need U.S. support. There have also been numerous
reports about Saudi-Israeli security cooperation in the face of Iran, a bigger
strategic priority than the symbolism of defending Jerusalem. Perhaps as a way
of keeping Saudi Arabia in line, the White House for the first time chided
Saudi Arabia for the humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen within an hour of Trump’s
Jerusalem announcement. The kingdom did issue a statement after the Jerusalem
decision, expressing “great disappointment” and “serious consequences” after
such an “irresponsible and unwarranted step.” But there’s been little else.
As the Washington Institute for Near East Policy’s Robert Satloff
detailed in Foreign Policy, a delegation from his think tank visited Riyadh as
Trump’s move on Jerusalem unfolded — but heard nary a word about it from
numerous Saudi officials and only a brief complaint from Crown Prince Mohammed
bin Salman himself. Perhaps the Saudis were being polite to visitors, but
politeness didn’t stop King Abdullah from once calling on visiting American
officials to “cut off the head of the snake” in reference to Iran.
By- Kim Ghattas
BBC correspondent covering international affairs
Public policy fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center.
No comments