THERESA MAY DEFEATED IN PARLIAMENT OVER BREXIT BLUEPRINT
Britain's prime minister Theresa May. — Reuters file photo |
Prime minister Theresa May's
government was defeated on Wednesday, when lawmakers forced through changes to
its Brexit blueprint that ministers said could endanger Britain's departure
from the European Union.
In a blow to May, already weakened
after losing her Conservative Party's majority in a June election, the 650-seat
parliament voted 309 to 305 in favour of an amendment to hand lawmakers more
say over a final exit deal with the EU.
Up until the last minute of an
often bitter debate in parliament, May's team tried to convince lawmakers in her
party to give up their demands and side with a government fearful that the move
will weaken its hand in tough Brexit negotiations.
Members of parliament are debating
the EU withdrawal bill, which will repeal the 1972 legislation binding Britain
to the EU and copy existing EU law into domestic law to ensure legal continuity
after ‘Exit Day’ on March 29, 2019.
In focus on Wednesday was an
amendment put forward by Conservative lawmaker and former attorney general
Dominic Grieve who wants parliament to have a meaningful vote on any deal
before it is finalised and for it to be written into law.
‘There is a time for everybody to
stand up and be counted,’ Grieve told parliament earlier, criticising some
fellow members of the Conservative Party for calling him a traitor over his
decision to vote against the government.
He dismissed a last-minute pledge
by justice minister Dominic Raab for government to write the promise of a
meaningful vote into law later on its journey through both houses of parliament
as coming ‘too late’.
The government was ‘disappointed’
by the vote, a spokeswoman said in a statement, adding that ‘this amendment
does not prevent us from preparing our statute book for exit day’.
But with May due at an EU summit on
Thursday to encourage the other 27 leaders to approve a move to the second
phase of Brexit talks and begin a discussion about future trade, the defeat
comes at a difficult time for the prime minister.
In the European Parliament, which
must also ratify any withdrawal treaty with Britain, its Brexit coordinator
cheekily tweeted that his British counterparts had ‘taken back control’ - a
reference to the catchphrase of pro-Brexit campaigners.
‘A good day for democracy,’ added
Guy Verhofstadt.
The EU withdrawal bill has been the
focus of seven days of often bitter debate, underscoring the deep divisions
over Brexit not only among the Conservatives but also in the main opposition
Labour Party and across the country.
It has also highlighted May's
weakness.
In June, she gambled on a snap
election to strengthen her party's majority in the 650-seat parliament but
instead bungled her campaign and ended up with a minority government propped up
by the 10 votes of a small, pro-Brexit Northern Irish party.
Since then she has struggled to
assert her authority over a Conservative Party which is deeply divided over the
best route out of the EU.
‘This defeat is a humiliating loss
of authority for the government on the eve of the European Council meeting,’
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said in a statement.
‘Theresa May has resisted
democratic accountability. Her refusal to listen means she will now have to
accept Parliament taking back control.’
Earlier, May had tried to persuade
lawmakers to vote with the government for her Brexit blueprint, saying Grieve's
amendment would put added time pressure on a government which wants to make
Britain ready to leave the EU in March 2019.
‘That could be at a very late stage
in the proceedings which could mean that we are not able to have the orderly
and smooth exit from the European Union that we wish to have,’ she told
parliament before an hours-long debate on the exit plan.
Her spokesman said the government had
‘in good faith come forward with a strong package of concessions to deal with
the spirit of the amendment’.
Pro-Brexit lawmakers fear the
amendment could force Britain to weaken its negotiating stance by offering
parliament the opportunity of forcing ministers back to the negotiating table
if it feels any final deal is not good enough.
Raab said that could convince the
EU that Britain would not walk away from a bad deal.
‘Actually if that looked likely
we'd end up with worse terms, and we'd be positively incentivising the EU to
give us worse terms,’ he told parliament.
No comments