OZONE LAYER DECLINING OVER POPULATED ZONES, STUDY SAYS
The ozone layer that
protects life on Earth from deadly ultraviolet radiation is unexpectedly
declining above the planet's most populated regions, Scientists are released a study Tuesday.
The greatest losses
in ozone occurred over Antarctica but the hole there has been closing since the
chemicals causing the problem were banned by the Montreal protocol. But the
ozone layer wraps the entire Earth and new research has revealed it is thinning
in the lower stratosphere over the non-polar areas.
A 1987 treaty, the
Montreal Protocol, banned industrial aerosols that chemically dissolved ozone
in the high atmosphere, especially above Antarctica.
Nearly three decades
later, the "ozone hole" over the South Pole and the upper reaches of
the stratosphere are showing clear signs of recovery.
The stratosphere
starts about 10 kilometers (six miles) above sea level and is about 40 kilometers
thick.
At the same time,
however, ozone in the lower stratosphere, 10-24 kilometers overhead, is slowly
disintegrating, an international team of two dozen researchers warned.
"In tropical
and middle latitudes" -- home to most of humanity -- "the ozone layer
has not started to recover yet," lead author William Ball, a researcher at
the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, told AFP.
"It is, in
fact, slightly worse today than 20 years ago."
At its most
depleted, around the turn of the 21st century, the ozone layer had declined by
about five percent, earlier research has shown.
The new study, based
on multiple satellite measurements and published in Atmospheric Chemistry and
Physics, estimates that it has now diminished an additional 0.5 percent.
If confirmed, that
would mean that the level of ozone depletion is "currently at its highest
level ever," Ball said by phone.
The potential for
harm in lower latitudes may actually be worse than at the poles, said co-author
Joanna Haigh, co-director of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change and the
Environment in London.
"The decreases
in ozone are less than we saw at the poles before the Montreal Protocol was
enacted, but UV radiation is more intense in these regions and more people live
there."
Two possible
suspects for this worrying trend stand out, the study concluded.
'CONCERNED, BUT NOT ALARMED'
One is a group of
chemicals used as solvents, paint strippers and degreasing agents --
collectively known as "very short-lived substances", or VSLSs -- that
attack ozone in the lower stratosphere.
A recent study found
that the stratospheric concentration of one of such ozone-depleting agent,
dichloromethane, had doubled in just over a decade.
Unlike the
long-lived chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs, that began tearing at the ozone layer
in the 1970s, this new family of chemicals only persists 6-12 months. They are
not covered by the Montreal Protocol.
"If it is a
VSLS problem, this should be relatively easy to deal with," said Ball.
"You could
apply an amendment to the Protocol and get these things banned."
The other possible
culprit of the renewed breakdown of the ozone layer is global warming.
Climate change
models do suggest that shifts in the way air circulates in the lower
stratosphere will eventually affect ozone levels, starting with the zone above
the tropics, where the substance forms.
But that change was
thought to be decades away and was not expected to reach the middle latitudes
between the tropics and the polar regions.
"If climate
change is the cause, it's a much more serious problem," said Ball, adding
that scientists disagree as to whether the stratosphere is already responding
in a significant way to climate change.
"We should be
concerned but not alarmed," Ball continued.
"This study is
waving a big red flag to the scientific community to say, 'there's something
going on here that doesn't show up in the models'."
Ball and colleagues
encouraged other researchers to duplicate their results and drive down the
level of uncertainty.
They also called for
data-gathering missions -- by balloon or airplane -- to measure more precisely
the level of VSLSs in the upper atmosphere.
At the same time,
they said, scientists need to reevaluate the complex interplay of
cause-and-effect in the lower stratosphere to see if models to date have missed
telltale signals showing a link with climate change.
Source: AFP
No comments