WITH DEADLINE LOOMING, MCCONNELL’S PLAN FOR DREAMER DEBATE STILL UNCLEAR EVEN TO GOP
File Photo : Mitch McConnell’s |
Just
a week away from a promised timeline to bring up a sweeping immigration debate
on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is privately giving no
indication how the battle over Dreamers will even begin.
Senior
Senate Republicans close to McConnell, as well as top GOP aides, say the
majority leader yet to sketch out his immigration strategy to his leadership
circle. How the floor debate begins is a crucial decision facing the Kentucky
Republican, particularly as the White House and conservative senators lobby him
to bring up the administration’s plan that goes too far for most Democrats and
is unsatisfactory to a swath of congressional Republicans.
“I don’t know,” Senate Majority Whip
John Cornyn of Texas said Monday when asked what kind of bill McConnell plans
to bring to the bill as the base measure. “That’s Sen. McConnell’s decision to
make, and I don’t know.”
Cornyn supports the White House
framework on enshrining protections of the Obama-era Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals program into law and said the Senate will vote on it “at
some point.”
“I think we need to vote on the
various ideas that were proposed. That’s what I infer when he talks about a
fair and open process,” Cornyn said. But still he cautioned: “Sen. McConnell
hasn’t announced his intention."
To help dig the Senate out of a
three-day shutdown last month, McConnell pledged to tee up an open floor
process on legislation protecting so-called Dreamers so as long as the
government stayed open.
In the two weeks since that promise, a
group of the No. 2 leaders in each chamber who were deputized to strike a deal
have gone nowhere. And now, Congress is staring down yet another government
funding deal with its immigration dilemma still unresolved.
Complicating matters further for
McConnell, the majority leader is facing competing pressures internally from
Republicans on even what bill he should use to start the Dreamer debate next
week.
White House legislative director Marc
Short, who visited Capitol Hill on Monday for a meeting with McConnell and
other top officials, said the administration was advocating that the White
House framework serve as the starting-off point for a floor debate.
“The only thing that has the chance to
pass is the basic framework that the president’s laid out. It makes an awful
lot of sense,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said Monday. “I would hope we start
out with a pretty reasonable bill that way that could potentially pass the
House.”
Yet other Senate Republicans,
especially those in a growing group of senators trying to craft a compromise
immigration framework, say the starting point for a floor debate needs to be as
impartial of a plan as possible — a bare-bones measure dealing with the legal
status of Dreamers and border security.
“What we want is something which is
neutral, so that people can add and subtract from it,” Sen. Mike Rounds
(R-S.D.) said. Asked what “neutral” means, Rounds responded: “That’s the
multibillion-dollar question. Perhaps the trillion-dollar question.”
The White House framework “can’t be
the beginning because [Democrats would say] that’s not neutral, that’s the
White House’s point of view,” Rounds added.
Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who
proposed a minimal border security and Dreamer legislation earlier Monday with
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), backed up Rounds’ argument.
“I think if he put on the floor as the
base bill the Cotton-Perdue bill I think all of us would be surprised,” Coons
said, referring to legislation from two conservative senators that dramatically
restricts legal immigration. “I think if he put on the floor as the base bill
the clean Dream Act, I think all of us would be surprised. I’m expecting
something in between.”
South Dakota Sen. John Thune, another
top McConnell deputy, also said as for a base bill, it was “hard to say at this
point.”
“There’s so many different verson of
bills out there,” Thune said. “We’ve got Graham-Durbin, Tillis-Lankford, Perdue
and Cotton, the president’s bill. There’s a whole bunch of them out there.”
SOURCE:
Politico
No comments